josch/img2pdf
3
6
Fork 10
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 5 Projects Releases 3 Wiki Activity

convert PNG bilevel images with jbig2decode rather than flatedecode #70

New issue
Closed
opened 2021-04-25 19:58:38 +00:00 by josch · 1 comment
josch commented 2021-04-25 19:58:38 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

By wizard on 2020-04-11T03:57:18.771Z

Bilevel images are widely used for scanned ebooks. Plz do so to explicitly reduce sizes.

By josch on 2020-04-11T06:49:15.782Z

I experimented with choosing the right encoder for bilevel images at around the time when I started writing img2pdf as is evident from the age of the file test_comp.sh from 2012.

But my tests didn't show a great advantage of using jbig2decode over first using png's paeth filter and then a flatedecode.

But maybe the kind of images I had is wrong -- do you have images of a different type where jbig2decode indeed produces significantly smaller images?

By josch on 2020-08-04T07:04:58.094Z

Hi @wizardforcel, I just wanted to ping you about this issue because I'm making a new release soon and was wondering whether you indeed have some input where jbig2decode provides a significant advantage over the current implementation. Otherwise, please close this issue. Thanks!

*By wizard on 2020-04-11T03:57:18.771Z* Bilevel images are widely used for scanned ebooks. Plz do so to explicitly reduce sizes. --- *By josch on 2020-04-11T06:49:15.782Z* --- I experimented with choosing the right encoder for bilevel images at around the time when I started writing img2pdf as is evident from the age of the file `test_comp.sh` from 2012. But my tests didn't show a great advantage of using jbig2decode over first using png's paeth filter and then a flatedecode. But maybe the kind of images I had is wrong -- do you have images of a different type where jbig2decode indeed produces significantly smaller images? --- *By josch on 2020-08-04T07:04:58.094Z* --- Hi @wizardforcel, I just wanted to ping you about this issue because I'm making a new release soon and was wondering whether you indeed have some input where jbig2decode provides a significant advantage over the current implementation. Otherwise, please close this issue. Thanks!
josch commented 2022-04-11 06:25:38 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Closing because of inactivity.

Closing because of inactivity.
josch closed this issue 2022-04-11 06:25:39 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
0.5.1
0.5.0
0.4.4
0.4.3
0.4.2
0.4.1
0.4.0
0.3.6
0.3.5
0.3.4
0.3.3
0.3.2
0.3.1
0.3.0
0.2.4
0.2.3
0.2.2
0.2.1
0.1.5.dev
0.2.0
0.1.5
0.1.4
0.1.3
0.1.2
0.1.1
0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

Something is not working

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

New feature

  
forwarded

not an img2pdf bug but in a dependency

  
help wanted

Need some help

  
invalid

Something is wrong

  
question

More information is needed

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No labels
bug
duplicate
enhancement
forwarded
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: josch/img2pdf#70
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?